|Statement||Sheila M. Olmstead, Robert N. Stavins.|
|Series||NBER working paper series -- working paper 14147, Working paper series (National Bureau of Economic Research : Online) -- working paper no. 14147.|
|Contributions||Stavins, R. N. 1948-, National Bureau of Economic Research.|
|The Physical Object|
|LC Control Number||2008610963|
 In comparing price and nonprice approaches to urban water conservation, we have highlighted some important areas for future research in the economics of water conservation. These include: empirical estimation of industrial demand elasticities and industrial responses to nonprice policies (since the focus of the literature has primarily. Next publication: Working Paper. Issues in Designing U.S. Climate Change Policy. Comparing Price and Non-price Approaches to Urban Water Conservation. Working Paper by Sheila M. Olmstead and Robert Stavins — June 15, Download. Jun 30, · Comparing Price and Non-Price Approaches to Urban Water Conservation. NBER Working Paper No. w We offer an analysis of the relative merits of market-based and prescriptive approaches to water conservation, where prices have rarely been used to allocate scarce supplies. Comparing Price and Non-Price Approaches to Urban Water Cited by: Comparing Price and Non-Price Approaches to Urban Water Conservation. It addresses and analyses the price or non-price approaches and their relative performance towards managing water .
Comparing Price and Non-Price Approaches to Urban Water Conservation Article in Water Resources Research 45 · July with 43 Reads How we measure 'reads'. The analysis emphasizes the emerging theoretical and empirical evidence that using prices to manage water demand is more cost-effective than implementing non-price conservation programs, similar to results for pollution control in earlier decades. Price-based approaches also have advantages in terms of monitoring and cyrusofficial.com: Sheila M. Olmstead and Robert N. Stavins. on reducing urban water demand through pricing and non-price conservation policies. We compare price and nonprice approaches along five dimensions: the ability of policies to achieve water conservation goals, cost effectiveness, distri-butional equity, monitoring and Cited by: Comparing Price and Non-Price Approaches to Urban Water Conservation Sheila M. Olmstead, Robert N. Stavins. NBER Working Paper No. Issued in June NBER Program(s):Environment and Energy Program, Industrial Organization Program, Law and Economics Program, Public Economics Program Urban water conservation is typically achieved through prescriptive regulations, including .
"Comparing Price and Non-price Approaches to Urban Water Conservation," Natural Resources Management Working Papers , Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM). Olmstead, Sheila M. & Stavins, Robert N., "Comparing Price and Non-price Approaches to Urban Water Conservation," Discussion Papers dp, Resources For the Future. Apr 29, · Comparing price and non-price approaches to urban water conservation Yale and Robert N. Stavins of the Harvard Kennedy School explored the relative merits of prescriptive and market-based conservation approaches. The paper compares the policies’ ability to achieve water conservation goals as well as their cost-effectiveness. A significant shift has occurred in pollution control regulations toward market-based policies in recent decades. We offer an analysis of the relative merits of market-based and prescriptive approaches to water conservation, where prices have rarely been used to allocate scarce supplies. Water conservation the answer to water shortage in the 21st century, Determinants of domestic water consumption theories and observations, Role of prices water tariffs, role of policy - regulations and conservation programs, Role of technology water saving devices, Demand side management tools comparing price and non-price approaches.